Aug 17, 2025, Posted by: Ra'eesa Moosa

Truecaller Faces Scrutiny in South Africa Over Data Privacy and Pay-to-Whitelist Scheme

Why Is Truecaller Under the Spotlight in South Africa?

It’s not every day you see a popular app like Truecaller under fire for its business tactics, but that's the reality in South Africa right now. The Information Regulator has launched an official investigation after South African companies complained that Truecaller’s way of handling spam calls might actually be crossing the line on privacy and fairness. At the heart of the uproar is Truecaller's so-called 'pay-to-whitelist' policy. Basically, some businesses say they have to cough up cash to escape the dreaded spam label on the app. That’s tough if your business relies on calling clients and you suddenly get flagged as a nuisance just because you won’t pay a fee.

POPIA—the Protection of Personal Information Act—sits at the core of South Africa’s privacy laws. It was put in place to keep people’s details safe and make sure companies don’t misuse personal data. But some businesses believe Truecaller’s system is brushing up against those rules in a big way. Their main worry? They say Truecaller lets anyone report a number as spam and then asks companies to pay for 'whitelisting' so their calls don’t end up ignored or rejected by users.

What Does This Mean for Businesses—and Your Data?

Let’s break down what’s really bugging everyone. First, even if a business is legitimate and just calling to confirm a booking or remind you about an appointment, they might get listed as spam if a few users hit the report button. Once they’re flagged, getting off that list isn’t so simple—it might involve paying a fee. South African businesses argue that this creates an unfair system and puts smaller companies at a big disadvantage.

As for regular folks using Truecaller, yes, the app helps you dodge scam calls and endless telemarketers. But behind the scenes, it collects and shares tons of contact details. The investigation is looking at whether this data collection fits with South Africa’s strict privacy laws, especially when it comes to business numbers and how they’re classified or sold.

  • Some businesses claim they’re listed as spam even without proof they made unwanted calls.
  • Truecaller’s payment model may pressure businesses to pay just to stay in good standing—something critics call a 'pay-to-play' setup.
  • The Information Regulator wants to know if personal and company data is being handled and stored properly, as required by POPIA.

This is shaping up to be a test for the whole call-screening industry, not just Truecaller. If the findings go against them, other apps working in South Africa—and maybe even in other African markets—will have to think hard about how they make money and treat user data. It’s a reminder that balancing privacy, safety, and fairness is anything but simple in today’s digital world.

Author

Ra'eesa Moosa

Ra'eesa Moosa

I am a journalist with a keen interest in covering the intricate details of daily events across Africa. My work focuses on delivering accurate and insightful news reports. Each day, I strive to bring light to the stories that shape our continent's narrative. My passion for digging deeper into issues helps in crafting stories that not only inform but also provoke thought.

Write a comment

Comments

One Love

One Love

This is wild 😤 I use Truecaller every day to block scams, but paying to unblock legit businesses? That’s not safety, that’s a tax on being visible. Someone’s making bank off our frustration.

August 17, 2025 AT 21:32
Vaishali Bhatnagar

Vaishali Bhatnagar

So they let anyone tag a number as spam then charge to fix it? Sounds like a scam wrapped in a safety app 🤷‍♀️

August 18, 2025 AT 18:56
Disha Gulati

Disha Gulati

This is just the beginning. They’re building a global database of every phone number and selling access to the highest bidder. Governments don’t even have this kind of control. Wake up people. They’re not protecting you-they’re profiling you.

August 19, 2025 AT 11:54
Abhimanyu Prabhavalkar

Abhimanyu Prabhavalkar

Oh so now businesses have to pay to not be labeled as spammers? Wow. I guess the free market means you pay to exist. Brilliant.

August 20, 2025 AT 02:48
Avijeet Das

Avijeet Das

I get why people use Truecaller. I do. But this model feels like it’s turning privacy into a paywall. If a small shop gets flagged because one angry customer clicked spam, that’s not justice. That’s systemic bias.

August 20, 2025 AT 13:08
RANJEET KUMAR

RANJEET KUMAR

Small biz owners are getting crushed here. Imagine running a clinic and suddenly your appointment reminders get blocked because someone didn’t like the call timing. Pay to be heard? No. Fight to be heard. 💪

August 21, 2025 AT 04:28
Dipen Patel

Dipen Patel

I love that Truecaller blocks scammers but this whitelist thing? It’s not fair. Why should a local bakery pay to be seen? This isn’t tech innovation-it’s exploitation. 🙏

August 21, 2025 AT 19:38
Sourav Sahoo

Sourav Sahoo

This is beyond unethical. They’re weaponizing fear. People think they’re safe, but they’re being manipulated into accepting a pay-to-play system where money decides who gets to communicate. This is digital feudalism. I’m uninstalling today.

August 22, 2025 AT 16:15
Priya Classy

Priya Classy

The structural flaw here is that Truecaller treats business numbers as if they’re inherently suspicious. POPIA requires consent and purpose limitation. If a company hasn’t violated any law, why should its number be treated as spam by default? The burden of proof is inverted. This isn’t protection-it’s algorithmic presumption of guilt. And the financial barrier to correction makes it a regressive tax on commerce. No wonder SMEs are collapsing under the weight of these opaque blacklists.

August 23, 2025 AT 15:38
Bharat Singh

Bharat Singh

They’re selling access to your contacts and charging businesses to be decent 🤡

August 24, 2025 AT 05:44
Mansi Mehta

Mansi Mehta

So if I report your number as spam because I hate your sales pitch, you have to pay to fix it? That’s not a privacy tool. That’s a bribery system disguised as tech.

August 25, 2025 AT 01:17
Sathish Kumar

Sathish Kumar

People think apps are free. But they’re not. You’re the product. And now you have to pay extra to not be treated like a criminal. We are all just data points in someone’s spreadsheet.

August 25, 2025 AT 13:23
Amit Varshney

Amit Varshney

The Information Regulator's intervention is both timely and necessary. The pay-to-whitelist model constitutes a prima facie violation of the principles of non-discrimination and proportionality under POPIA. The aggregation and monetization of business contact information without explicit consent, coupled with a commercialized delisting mechanism, creates an undue burden on lawful enterprise and undermines the very intent of data protection legislation. Regulatory clarity must be enforced to prevent the privatization of public communication infrastructure.

August 26, 2025 AT 05:04
Sourav Zaman

Sourav Zaman

Truecaller is just doing what every app does-monetize your data. The fact that you’re surprised means you never read the TOS. Also, if your business is so legit why are you even on a spam list? Maybe you’re just bad at calling? 🤔

August 26, 2025 AT 08:27

SHARE

© 2025. All rights reserved.